Examining the structure of subjective well-being through meta-analysis of the associations among positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction

By M. Busseri. 2018

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e29627c9dda4bdbc81b043d3d0772a2e3410f4e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Frank Martela
2. Kennon M. Sheldon
3. Richard M. Ryan
4. Sonja Lyubomirsky
5. Maarten Vansteenkiste
6. Bart Soenens
7. D. Vella‐Brodrick
8. Adam M. Grant

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Frank Martela
2. Kennon M. Sheldon
3. M. Demir
4. Sonja Lyubomirsky
5. Richard M. Ryan

In Social Psychology

1. Frank Martela
2. Kennon M. Sheldon
3. Sonja Lyubomirsky
4. Richard M. Ryan
5. Maarten Vansteenkiste
6. M. Demir
7. Bart Soenens
8. D. Vella‐Brodrick

Citations in the corpus

• Clarifying the Concept of Well-Being: Psychological Need Satisfaction as the Common Core Connecting Eudaimonic and Subjective Well-Being (2019, background): “…well-being is most typically conceptualized as SWB, a category that most commonly includes positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction (Busseri, 2018; Diener, 2012; Diener et al., 1999), again, many researchers have argued that life satisfaction and affect should be complemented with…”