Genome Size Evolution in Plants
By Michael D. Bennett, Ilia J. Leitch. 2005
199 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e28580dc32d57d9a9ad1ef8c72c18eee15e55fd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Petr Pyšek
- D. Richardson
- J. L. Le Roux
- S. Bancheva
- J. Suda
- M. te Beest
- S. Kuebbing
- Johann Greilhuber
In Molecular Biology
- Johann Greilhuber
- D. Richardson
- J. Loureiro
- S. Kuebbing
- S. Bancheva
- Petr Pyšek
- J. Suda
- J. L. Le Roux
In Plant Science
- D. Richardson
- Petr Pyšek
- J. L. Le Roux
- S. Bancheva
- J. Loureiro
- J. Suda
- M. te Beest
- Johann Greilhuber
Citations in the corpus
- Genome size in Bulgarian Centaurea s.l. (Asteraceae) (2006, background): “Holoploid and monoploid genome size are taxonomically significant traits of fundamental biological importance (Bennett and Leitch 1995, 2005a; Bennett et al. 2000; Gregory 2003, 2005).”
- The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. (2012, background): “This may potentially slow down metabolism and growth rates in polyploids (Cavalier-Smith, 1978), due to, for example, longer replication times (Bennett and Leitch, 2005; Gregory, 2005).”
- The scaling of genome size and cell size limits maximum rates of photosynthesis with implications for ecological strategies (2019, background): “…phenotypic correlates of genome size independent of variation in genome structure, commonly referred to as “nucleotype” effects, although some of these correlations are disputable after accounting for shared phylogenetic history (Bennett 1971; Cavalier-Smith 1978; 1982; Bennett and Leitch 2005).”