The Distinctiveness Principle: Identity, Meaning, and the Bounds of Cultural Relativity

By Vivian L. Vignoles, X. Chryssochoou, G. Breakwell. 2000

317 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Extending theories of distinctiveness motivation in identity (Breakwell, 1987; Brewer, 1991; Snyder & Fromkin, 1980), we discuss the precise role of distinctiveness in identity processes and the cross-cultural generality of the distinctiveness principle. We argue that (a) within Western cultures, distinctiveness is necessaryfor the construction of meaning within identity, and (b) the distinctiveness principle is not incompatible with non-Western cultural systems. We propose a distinction among three sources of distinctiveness: position, difference, and separateness, with different implications for identity and behavior. These sources coexist within cultures, on both individual and group levels of selfrepresentation, but they may be emphasized differently according to culture and context.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e1580d4ebafde4dfde6d84c86889e2cc4d497ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

  1. Vivian L. Vignoles
  2. E. Scabini
  3. Camillo Regalia
  4. Claudia Manzi
  5. A. Siraj
  6. R. Jaspal
  7. J. Golledge
  8. S. Dommer

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Vivian L. Vignoles
  2. R. Jaspal
  3. Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick
  4. S. Kalyanaraman
  5. Shyam Sundar
  6. A. Siraj
  7. Claudia Manzi
  8. Camillo Regalia

Citations in the corpus