Development and Test of a Whole-Lifetime Foraging and Bioenergetics Growth Model for Drift-Feeding Brown Trout

By J. Hayes, J. Stark, K. Shearer. 2000

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e1128fd036938b6606f56550d2221c6653224d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Impacts of Introduced Salmonids on Native Galaxiids in New Zealand Upland Streams: A New Look at an Old Problem (2003, background): “The size of the trout raises questions as to where the food/energy comes from for them to achieve such size ( Hayes 1996a ; Hayes et al.”
Widespread Consumption-dependent Systematic Error in Fish Bioenergetics Models and its Implications (2004, background): “…processes such as the role of fish in lake nutrient cycling (Schindler and Eby 1997), and commonly serve as subcomponents of individual-based models of fish life history and population dynamics (Trebitz 1991; Rose and Cowan 1993) and other model types (Hayes et al. 2000; Burke and Rice 2002).”
The effect of turbulence on the cost of swimming for juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) (2003, methodology): “Bioenergetic models can be applied to quantify fish habitat quality using the net energy gain obtained by a fish under specified environmental conditions (Hayes et al. 2000).”
Bioenergetics Modeling in the 21st Century : Reviewing New Insights and Revisiting Old Constraints (2008, background): “Sauger Sander canadensis þ2 to þ770 12 2 1,114 2 0 Minton and McLean (1982) Northern pike Esox lucius þ24 to þ56 8 3 1,290 2 0 Diana (1983) Largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides þ8 6 1 413 1 3 Rice and Cochran (1984) Sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka þ10 to þ15 4 2 391 1 3 Beauchamp et al.”
Causes and consequences of invertebrate drift in running waters: from individuals to populations and trophic fluxes (2016, background): “In contrast, descriptive empirical studies have primarily focused on describing 69 bulk community fluxes of drift (e.g., Elliott 1967a; McLay 1970; Shearer et al. 2003), often with 70 specific reference to predicting availability of prey for fish (e.g., Hayes et al. 2000; Weber et al. 71 2014).”
Assessing the Habitat Requirements of Stream Fishes: An Overview and Evaluation of Different Approaches (2003, methodology): “…modeled, with swimming costs a simple function of velocity at the focal point and energy intake a function of size of the foraging window, reactive distance, and energy concentration of invertebrates in the drift (Hughes and Dill 1990; Hayes et al. 2000; Nislow et al. 2000; Guensch et al. 2001).”
Does one size fit all? An evaluation of length–weight relationships for New Zealand's freshwater fish species (2013, background): “…a function of length is fundamental information for fisheries scientists trying to deduce age structure (Jellyman 1997), calculate growth rates (Hansen & Closs 2009), model bioenergetics (Hayes et al. 2000; Booker et al. 2004) or quantify some other aspect of fish population dynamics (Safran 1992).”
Testing a model of drift-feeding using three- dimensional videography of wild brown trout, Salmo trutta, in a New Zealand river (2003, methodology): “2001), and growth rates (Hughes 1998; Hayes et al. 2000).”
Crying wolf, crying foul, or crying shame: alien salmonids and a biodiversity crisis in the southern cool-temperate galaxioid fishes? (2006, background): “Furthermore, Hayes (1996b; Hayes et al. 2000) has much more recently sought to explain how New Zealand’s brown trout obtain enough food to generate observed growth rates, and which produce the large fish in New Zealand rivers—particularly, how they can reach such size, maintain condition, and spawn…”