Bio-logging science: sensing beyond the boundaries

By I. Boyd, A. Kato, Y. Ropert‐Coudert. 2004

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9dff829a1f5af3fa96d5696bfdc5395fffdb6ac2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Foraging under contrasting oceanographic conditions: the gentoo penguin at Kerguelen Archipelago (2005, background): “For the last 20 yr, the development of microprocessor-based time-depth recorders (e.g. Kooyman et al. 1992, Croxall et al. 1993, Wilson 1995, Boyd et al. 2004), satellite transmitters and global positioning systems (e.g. Jouventin & Weimerskirch 1990, McConnell et al. 2002, Weimerskirch et al.…”
Biotelemetry and biologging in endangered species research and animal conservation: relevance to regional, national, and IUCN Red List threat assessments (2008, methodology): “Indeed, logging techniques all rely on the sensing and logging/recording of information derived from one or more sensor (Boyd et al. 2004).”
Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges (2010, background): “Interestingly, marine biology, where boundaries to human senses are apparent, was the first field of animal ecology to use telemetry (Boyd et al. 2004).”
A comparison of indirect measures of feeding behaviour based on ARGOS tracking data (2007, background): “Bio-logging science does not always utilize traditional hypothesis testing (Boyd et al., 2004) in part because many of the quantitative tools available for the analysis of movement behaviour are often under-utilized in favour of qualitative assessments of behaviour.”
Identification of behaviours from accelerometer data in a wild social primate (2017, background): “The use of accelerometers has been used most widely in studies of marine mammals and birds [3, 4], but recent advances in bio-logging technologies have made devices smaller, cheaper and longer-lasting, drawing interest from researchers working with a wider diversity of species [5].”