On the Margin: Power and Women's HIV Risk Reduction Strategies
By H. Amaro, A. Raj. 2000
386 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9df8facd84e28fd3867ab722d3b9950f2fe6d472
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- Ann M. Merriwether
- Allison S Caruthers
- Laina Y. Bay-Cheng
- L. Monique Ward
- Sheri R. Levy
- A. Zucker
- Nicola Curtin
- Lisa Bowleg
In General Health Professions
In Health
Citations in the corpus
- Safer, Better Sex Through Feminism: The Role of Feminist Ideology in Women's Sexual Well-Being (2008, background): “Instead, she and other feminist researchers and theorists (e.g., Amaro, 1995; Amaro & Raj, 2000; Gavey & McPhillips, 1999; Gavey, McPhillips, & Doherty, 2001; Tolman, 2006) view the redress of gender norms, particularly those that circumscribe women’s sexual subjectivity, as a key step toward safer…”
- “The Ball was Always in His Court”: An Exploratory Analysis of Relationship Scripts, Sexual Scripts, and Condom Use among African American Women (2004, background): “…power perspective on women’s HIV risk, more research is needed to understand how factors such as emotional and financial dependence diminish African American women’s relationship power with regard to condom use (Amaro, 1995; Amaro & Raj, 2000; Bowleg, Tschann, Lucas, & Burkholder, 2003).”
- The Role of Sexual Precedence in Verbal Sexual Coercion (2004, background): “Women’s apparent lack of sexual power within relationships may also be viewed within a larger context of women’s economic dependence and cultural oppression (Amaro & Raj, 2000; Quina, Harlow, Morokoff, Burkholder, & Deiter, 2000).”
- Femininity Ideology and Sexual Health in Young Women: A focus on Sexual Knowledge, Embodiment, and Agency (2011, background): “Understanding women's sexual health requires understanding gender roles and gendered relationships of power ( Amaro & Raj, 2000 ; Amaro, Raj, & Reed, 2001 ; Tolman, Striepe, & Harmon, 2003 ; WHO, n.”
- Modified social ecological model: a tool to guide the assessment of the risks and risk contexts of HIV epidemics (2013, methodology): “Some models have been used to articulate underlying individual motivations for behaviors, such as the health belief model, the theory of planned action, and the model of behavior change [6,7].”
- Understanding Women's Risk for HIV Infection Using Social Dominance Theory and the Four Bases of Gendered Power (2010, background): “Together these criticisms have led many researchers to point toward power as an essential element contributing to women’s risk for HIV infection through heterosexual transmission (Amaro & Raj, 2000; Heise & Elias, 1995; Pulerwitz, Gortmaker, & DeJong, 2000; Zierler and Krieger, 1997).”
- Gender Differences in Condom Use Behavior? The Role of Power and Partner-Type (2008, background): “However, researchers in the area of women-focused HIV prevention have begun to call for increased attention to gender-specific barriers to condom use, with a focus on the role of relationship power (Amaro 1995; Amaro and Raj 2000; Campbell 1995) and partnertype (Hobfoll 1998; Impett and Peplau 200”