Experimental psychology: Event timing turns punishment to reward
By Hiromu Tanimoto, Martin Heisenberg, B. Gerber. 2004
205 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Raphael Cohn
- Ianessa Morantte
- V. Ruta
- Yoshinori Aso
- Gerald M. Rubin
- Wulfram Gerstner
- S. Waddell
- Hiromu Tanimoto
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Wulfram Gerstner
- R. Malenka
- S. Lammel
- Wolfram Schultz
- Henry Markram
- B. Lim
- Yoshinori Aso
- Gerald M. Rubin
In Molecular Biology
- Raphael Cohn
- Ianessa Morantte
- V. Ruta
- Yoshinori Aso
- R. Malenka
- Wulfram Gerstner
- Hiromu Tanimoto
- Gerald M. Rubin
Citations in the corpus
- Dopaminergic neurons write and update memories with cell-type-specific rules (2016, background): “However, animals can also learn that the CS predicts the end of an aversive US, and are consequently attracted to the CS (Tanimoto et al., 2004).”
- Pain-relief learning in flies, rats, and man: basic research and applied perspectives (2014, methodology): “…of a relief-learning paradigm on the basis of the startle response in rats (Andreatta et al. 2012), it seemed significant that relief-learning in flies works best with a relatively long gap between electric shock offset and cue onset (5–25 sec) (Tanimoto et al. 2004; Yarali et al. 2008).”
- Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. (2005, unknown): “as competing conspecifics and predators [108-112] as well as valued and positively reinforcing stimuli [113].”
- Spaced Training Forms Complementary Long-Term Memories of Opposite Valence in Drosophila (2019, background): “If shock, or artificial DAN activation is presented <45 seconds before odor presentation flies form an appetitive ‘relief memory’ for that odor (Tanimoto et al., 2004; Aso and Rubin, 2016; Handler et al., 2019).”
- Behavioural plasticity: an interaction between evolution and experience (2010, background): “For instance, Drosophila cannot learn to associate an odorant with an electric shock in a classical conditioning experiment when both are separated by more than 60s (Tanimoto et al. 2004).”
- Reward and aversion in a heterogeneous midbrain dopamine system (2013, background): “…be inhibited by aversive stimuli (Mirenowicz and Schultz, 1996; Ungless et al., 2004) and it can be postulated that any increase in DA neuron activity caused by an acute aversive stimulus (e.g. foot shock) might be due to the rewarding effects of terminating the stimulus (Tanimoto et al., 2004).”
- Event Timing in Associative Learning: From Biochemical Reaction Dynamics to Behavioural Observations (2012, background): “1) [11,13–17]: Flies learn to avoid an odour that precedes electric shock during training (i.”
- A History of Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity (2011, background): “Studies from Martin Heisenberg’s and Gilles Laurent’s laboratories also provide intriguing evidence for the existence of STDP in vivo in insects, such as the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (Tanimoto et al., 2004) and the locust Schistocerca americana (Cassenaer and Laurent, 2007).”
- Neuronal mechanisms underlying innate and learned olfactory processing in Drosophila. (2019, background): “If punishment precedes odor, flies learn to approach the trained 262 odor [71,85].”
- Neuronal Reward and Decision Signals: From Theories to Data. (2015, background): “Accordingly, the simple timing of a conditioned stimulus relative to an aversive event can turn punishment into reward (584).”
- The Drosophila Mushroom Body: From Architecture to Algorithm in a Learning Circuit. (2020, background): “When reinforcement arrives before the odor cue, rather than following it, the odor switches from predicting upcoming reinforcement to predicting the end of reinforcement, and so the opposite association is formed (Aso&Rubin 2016, Gerber et al. 2014,Tanimoto et al. 2004).”
- Distinct dopamine receptor pathways underlie the temporal sensitivity of associative learning (2019, background): “Drosophila, for example, can form either negative or positive associations with an odor depending on whether the odor precedes or follows an aversive reinforcement during conditioning (Aso and Rubin, 2016; König et al., 2018; Tanimoto et al., 2004).”
- Dopamine activity in projection neurons regulates short‐lasting olfactory approach memory in Drosophila (2022, background): “…them to an odour, flies show conditioned preference to this odour, a behaviour that arises from association of the odour with relief from shock (relief memory), or from association of the odour with safety (safety memory) (Jacob & Waddell, 2020; Tanimoto et al., 2004; Yarali & Gerber, 2010).”