THE EXPLOIT: A THEORY OF NETWORKS
By Alexander R. Galloway, Eugene Thacker. Soundings (Nashville, Tenn.), 2007
414 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The Exploit is that rare thing: a book with a clear grasp of how networks operate that also understands the political implications of this emerging form of power. It cuts through the nonsense about how 'free' and 'democratic' networks supposedly are, and it offers a rich analysis of how network protocols create a new kind of control. Essential reading for all theorists, artists, activists, techheads, and hackers of the Net. McKenzie Wark, author of A Hacker Manifesto The network has become the core organizational structure for postmodern politics, culture, and life, replacing the modern eras hierarchical systems. From peer-to-peer file sharing and massive multiplayer online games to contagion vectors of digital or biological viruses and global affiliations of terrorist organizations, the network form has become so invasive that nearly every aspect of contemporary society can be located within it. Borrowing their title from the hacker term for a program that takes advantage of a flaw in a network system, Alexander R. Galloway and Eugene Thacker challenge the widespread assumption that networks are inherently egalitarian. Instead, they contend that there exist new modes of control entirely native to networks, modes that are at once highly centralized and dispersed, corporate and subversive. In this provocative book-length essay, Galloway and Thacker argue that a whole new topology must be invented to resist and reshape the network form, one that is as asymmetrical in relationship to networks as the network is in relation to hierarchy. Alexander R. Galloway is associate professor of culture and communications at New York University and the author of Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture (Minnesota, 2006) and Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization. Eugene Thacker is associate professor of new media at the Georgia Institute of Technology and the author of Biomedia (Minnesota, 2004) and The Global Genome: Biotechnology, Politics, and Culture.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9de8f94a51aa1f68ec5ae0e30f8366ffc4dfbd3f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies (2010, background): “The figure of the network has become the main way of describing this spatial from (Galloway and Thacker, 2007).”
- Policy mixes for incumbency: Exploring the destructive recreation of renewable energy, shale gas ‘fracking,’ and nuclear power in the United Kingdom (2017, neutral): “…horizontal and vertical divisions in ‘rhizomic’ ways (Deleuze & Guattari 1987; Deleuze & Guattari 1987; Stirling 2016; Sovacool and Hess 2017), that may render ostensibly neatly-separable scales, levels and sectors little more than stories (Ernstson 2008; Steinberg 2008; Galloway & Thacker 2007).”