Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task (2004, background): “Indeed, repetition effects were obtained, although not very reliably and only in task versions with very short intervals between S1 and S2 ( Hommel & Colzato, 2003 ).”
When an object is more than a binding of its features: Evidence for two mechanisms of visual feature integration (2009, background): “Direct evidence for the retrieval of object files has been obtained in an fMRI study by Keizer et al. (2008). They presented subjects with preview (S1) and probe displays (S2) that both consisted of two blended pictures showing a face and a house.”
Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action. (2004, unknown): “Very probably, variations in STIMULUS-ONSET ASYNCHRONY (SOA) are responsible for these contrasting findings: objectnonspecific effects dominate at short SOAs ‐ that is, when prime and probe stimuli appear in brief succession ‐ and give way to OBJECT-SPECIFIC REPETITION EFFECTS as SOA increases [ 12 ”