Identifiability of single-index models and additive-index models
By Wei Lin, K. B. Kulasekera. 2007
98 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9dd85daeedb09eba253846bbf45ef8de427bdf9b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jiti Gao
- Fadoua Balabdaoui
- Chaohua Dong
- Cécile Durot
- Ming Yuan
- Dag Tjøstheim
- Wolfgang Karl Härdle
- Xia Cui
In Statistics and Probability
- Fadoua Balabdaoui
- Jiti Gao
- Chaohua Dong
- Wolfgang Karl Härdle
- Dag Tjøstheim
- Cécile Durot
- Ming Yuan
- Xia Cui
Citations in the corpus
- Least squares estimation in the monotone single index model (2016, methodology): “Plan and Vershynin (2013); Plan et al. (2016). There are several other alternatives which return an estimate of the index in the single index model with a non necessarily monotone ridge function, and these could also be used here.”
- ON THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF ADDITIVE INDEX MODELS (2011, methodology): “To illustrate the difficulty in identifying the additive index model, Lin and Kulasekera (2007) consider the special case where all ridge functions are quadratic and conjectured that it might be necessary to require p > (2M − 1)/2 + √ (2M − 1)2 + 8M2/2 to ensure identifiability.”
- Estimation for single-index and partially linear single-index integrated models (2016, methodology): “Following the existing identifiability condition, for example, Lin and Kulasekera (2007), we assume for models studied later that ‖θ0‖ = 1 and the first nonzero component of θ0 is positive.”
- The EFM approach for single-index models (2011, methodology): “This is a commonly used assumption on the index parameter [see Carroll et al. (1997), Zhu and Xue (2006), Lin and Kulasekera (2007)].”