A transcriptionally and functionally distinct PD-1+ CD8+ T cell pool with predictive potential in non-small cell lung cancer treated with PD-1 blockade

By D. Thommen, V. Koelzer, P. Herzig, A. Roller, Marcel P. Trefny, Sarah Dimeloe, A. Kiialainen, Jonathan Hanhart, Catherine Schill, C. Hess and 9 more. Nature Medicine, 2018

1,018 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Evidence from mouse chronic viral infection models suggests that CD8+ T cell subsets characterized by distinct expression levels of the receptor PD-1 diverge in their state of exhaustion and potential for reinvigoration by PD-1 blockade. However, it remains unknown whether T cells in human cancer adopt a similar spectrum of exhausted states based on PD-1 expression levels. We compared transcriptional, metabolic and functional signatures of intratumoral CD8+ T lymphocyte populations with high (PD-1T), intermediate (PD-1N) and no PD-1 expression (PD-1–) from non-small-cell lung cancer patients. PD-1T T cells showed a markedly different transcriptional and metabolic profile from PD-1N and PD-1– lymphocytes, as well as an intrinsically high capacity for tumor recognition. Furthermore, while PD-1T lymphocytes were impaired in classical effector cytokine production, they produced CXCL13, which mediates immune cell recruitment to tertiary lymphoid structures. Strikingly, the presence of PD-1T cells was strongly predictive for both response and survival in a small cohort of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with PD-1 blockade. The characterization of a distinct state of tumor-reactive, PD-1-bright lymphocytes in human cancer, which only partially resembles that seen in chronic infection, provides potential avenues for therapeutic intervention. Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells with high expression of PD-1 in non-small-cell lung cancer are distinct from exhausted T cells in chronic virus infection, have high tumor reactivity and associate with response to PD-1-targeted immunotherapy.

Subfields: Immunology, Oncology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9dc8a4f704857a73aa546456b470efb7a11709e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Immunology

  1. D. Thommen
  2. Ton N. Schumacher
  3. Charles Swanton
  4. Tariq Enver
  5. Sergio A. Quezada
  6. C. Blank
  7. M. Hellmann
  8. Nicholas McGranahan

In Oncology

  1. Nicholas McGranahan
  2. D. Thommen
  3. Ton N. Schumacher
  4. Charles Swanton
  5. Sergio A. Quezada
  6. C. Blank
  7. M. Hellmann

Citations in the corpus