Revisiting non-Gaussianity from non-attractor inflation models

By Yi-Fu Cai, Xingang Chen, M. H. Namjoo, Misao Sasaki, Dong-Gang Wang, Ziwei Wang. 2017

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Non-attractor inflation is known as the only single field inflationary scenario that can violate non-Gaussianity consistency relation with the Bunch-Davies vacuum state and generate large local non-Gaussianity. However, it is also known that the non-attractor inflation by itself is incomplete and should be followed by a phase of slow-roll attractor. Moreover, there is a transition process between these two phases. In the past literature, this transition was approximated as instant and the evolution of non-Gaussianity in this phase was not fully studied. In this paper, we follow the detailed evolution of the non-Gaussianity through the transition phase into the slow-roll attractor phase, considering different types of transition. We find that the transition process has important effect on the size of the local non-Gaussianity. We first compute the net contribution of the non-Gaussianities at the end of inflation in canonical non-attractor models. If the curvature perturbations keep evolving during the transition—such as in the case of smooth transition or some sharp transition scenarios—the 𝒪(1) local non-Gaussianity generated in the non-attractor phase can be completely erased by the subsequent evolution, although the consistency relation remains violated. In extremal cases of sharp transition where the super-horizon modes freeze immediately right after the end of the non-attractor phase, the original non-attractor result can be recovered. We also study models with non-canonical kinetic terms, and find that the transition can typically contribute a suppression factor in the squeezed bispectrum, but the final local non-Gaussianity can still be made parametrically large.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9db11b46d56169df1be3b5343682c3346f715f7d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. A. Kehagias
  2. A. Riotto
  3. G. Franciolini
  4. C. Byrnes
  5. P. S. Cole
  6. S. Patil
  7. D. Baumann
  8. D. Green

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. A. Kehagias
  2. C. Byrnes
  3. A. Riotto
  4. G. Franciolini
  5. P. S. Cole
  6. S. Patil
  7. D. Baumann
  8. D. Green

Citations in the corpus