Natural Enemies--Metaphor or Misconception?

By M. Chew, Manfred D. Laubichler. Science, 2003

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9daf77194018fe2110d98922c9769c97d8667465

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. I. A. Grigorovich
2. H. MacIsaac
3. A. Ricciardi
4. R. Colautti
5. Michael N. Dawson
6. Andrew Hamilton
7. M. Chew

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Michael N. Dawson
2. A. Ricciardi
3. H. MacIsaac
4. R. Colautti
5. Andrew Hamilton
6. M. Chew

In Social Psychology

1. Michael N. Dawson
2. R. Colautti
3. H. MacIsaac

Citations in the corpus

• Incipient speciation of Catostylus mosaicus (Scyphozoa, Rhizostomeae, Catostylidae), comparative phylogeography and biogeography in south‐east Australia (2005, background): “This terminology emphasizes a more appropriate dynamic framework (Chew & Laubichler, 2003) in which both organisms (intrinsic) and filters (extrinsic) are considered iteratively and one that should better explain, for example, apparent exceptions (e.g. Knowlton & Keller, 1986; Shulman & Bermingham,…”
• The Rise and Fall of Biotic Nativeness: A Historical Perspective (2010, background): “Most of these questioned the appropriateness of the native – alien dichotomy to some degree and some have argued against its continued use (see especially Coates 2003 ; Aitken 2004 ; Townsend 2005 ) whereas others were content to explore its cultural infl uence (for example Trigger et al. 2008 ).”
• A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species (2004, background): “Invasion ecology has enjoyed a rapid ascension in the public domain, owing in part to the extensive use of adjectives like ‘invasive’, ‘alien’, ‘noxious’ and ‘exotic’ (Binggeli, 1994; Chew & Laubichler, 2003).”
• Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis (2004, background): “However, in addition to the problems with diversity comparisons outlined earlier, erroneous inferences could also result because qualification of NIS as ‘invasive’ or ‘noxious’ are often poorly and inconsistently defined (Richardson et al. 2000a; Chew & Laubichler 2003; Colautti & MacIsaac 2004).”