Air quality model performance evaluation

By Joseph C. Chang, S. Hanna. 2004

1,200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9dabf8300d102fa31c42140985ba27b53f468eef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. Joseph C. Chang
2. S. Hanna
3. I. Castro
4. Zheng-Tong Xie

In Environmental Engineering

1. Joseph C. Chang
2. S. Hanna
3. I. Castro
4. Zheng-Tong Xie

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. Joseph C. Chang
2. S. Hanna

Citations in the corpus

• Acceptance criteria for urban dispersion model evaluation (2012, methodology): “We mainly focused on quantitative performance measures and acceptance criteria here and in Chang and Hanna (2010), but other IV&V components are also important.”
• Global, regional and local health impacts of civil aviation emissions (2015, methodology): “Uncertainties in AERMOD-computed concentrations are represented by a T(0.5, 1, 1.5), i.e. a ±50% triangularly distributed uncertainty (Chang and Hanna 2004), while the additional uncertainties of RDC are represented by T(0.9, 1, 1.1) based on validation results provided in Lee (2012).”