Economics and Land‐Use Change in Prioritizing Private Land Conservation
By D. Newburn, Sarah E. Reed, Peter Berck, A. Merenlender. 2005
232 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d9490fa2ed4d8d9bd15e59a7ef81c27f6206f45
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Samuel Rubinoff
- Atte Moilanen
- K. Wendland
- M. Honzák
- Benjamin Vitale
- J. Randrianarisoa
- Aija S. Kukkala
- R. Portela
In Global and Planetary Change
- Samuel Rubinoff
- Atte Moilanen
- K. Wendland
- M. Honzák
- Benjamin Vitale
- J. Randrianarisoa
- Aija S. Kukkala
- R. Portela
Citations in the corpus
- Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: Opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar (2010, background): “The idea of geographically targeting high threat/low opportunity cost lands for conservation is not new, and is already used to maximize the cost-effectiveness of many protected areas and reserves (Newburn et al., 2005; Naidoo et al., 2006).”
- Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning (2012, background): “’ Species richness or habitat diversity is usually related to representativeness (Austin & Margules, 1986; Newburn et al., 2005) and methods of operations research are often applied to optimise representation of a set of target taxa or habitat types (Bedward, Pressey & Keith, 1992; Margules & Sarkar”