A Meta-analysis of IFRS Adoption Effects

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Content analysis in social and environmental reporting research: trends and challenges (2015, methodology): “…synthesising, and analysing results of multiple studies (as it is also generally the case in accounting and management research, see e.g. Borkowski, 1996; Geyskens et al., 2009; Ahmed et al., 2013), “statistical techniques are not a necessary feature of such reviews” (Schwandt, 2007, p. 266).”
The deteriorating usefulness of financial report information and how to reverse it (2018, unknown): “Ahmed et al. (2013) conducted a statistical meta-analysis – not your regular literature survey – of no fewer than 57 IFRS studies and report that:”
The association between risk disclosure and firm characteristics: a meta-analysis (2016, methodology): “To assess the effect of some explanatory variables on risk reporting, it is necessary to have a sufficiently large number of studies that have empirically addressed a particular variable (Ahmed, Chalmers, and Khlif 2013).”
A review of the IFRS adoption literature (2016, background): “Ahmed, Chalmers, and Khlif (2013) conduct a meta-analysis of the IFRS literature from a wide range of journals and working papers.”