Building Deep, Equivariant Capsule Networks
By Sairaam Venkatraman, S. Balasubramanian, R. Raghunatha Sarma. 2019
29 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Capsule networks are constrained by the parameter-expensive nature of their layers, and the general lack of provable equivariance guarantees. We present a variation of capsule networks that aims to remedy this. We identify that learning all pair-wise part-whole relationships between capsules of successive layers is inefficient. Further, we also realise that the choice of prediction networks and the routing mechanism are both key to equivariance. Based on these, we propose an alternative framework for capsule networks that learns to projectively encode the manifold of pose-variations, termed the space-of-variation (SOV), for every capsule-type of each layer. This is done using a trainable, equivariant function defined over a grid of group-transformations. Thus, the prediction-phase of routing involves projection into the SOV of a deeper capsule using the corresponding function. As a specific instantiation of this idea, and also in order to reap the benefits of increased parameter-sharing, we use type-homogeneous group-equivariant convolutions of shallower capsules in this phase. We also introduce an equivariant routing mechanism based on degree-centrality. We show that this particular instance of our general model is equivariant, and hence preserves the compositional representation of an input under transformations. We conduct several experiments on standard object-classification datasets that showcase the increased transformation-robustness, as well as general performance, of our model to several capsule baselines.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Erik J. Bekkers
- David W. Romero
- J. Tomczak
- Mark Hoogendoorn
- Max Welling
- Luis A. Lastras
- Sebastian Nowozin
- Stefano Ermon
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Erik J. Bekkers
- David W. Romero
- J. Tomczak
- Mark Hoogendoorn
- Max Welling
- Luis A. Lastras
- Stefano Ermon
- Sebastian Nowozin
Citations in the corpus
- Group Equivariant Stand-Alone Self-Attention For Vision (2020, neutral): “, 2020b) and more general symmetry groups (Cohen & Welling, 2016; Kondor & Trivedi, 2018; Weiler & Cesa, 2019; Cohen et al., 2019a; Bekkers, 2020; Venkataraman et al., 2020).”
- Wavelet Networks: Scale Equivariant Learning From Raw Waveforms (2020, methodology): “Following the principle of symmetry preservation, additional approaches for computer vision tasks have been proposed to preserve additional symmetries in visual data, such as planar rotations [19, 45, 79, 76, 36, 8, 27, 4, 70, 35, 23], spherical rotations [13, 77, 75, 15, 65], scaling [46, 78, 62] a”
- Attentive Group Equivariant Convolutional Networks (2020, unknown): “…Brostow, 2018; Cohen et al., 2019b; Thomas et al., 2018; Kondor & Trivedi, 2018), scaling (Marcos et al., 2018; Worrall & Welling, 2019; Sos-novik et al., 2020) and general symmetry groups (Cohen & Welling, 2016a; Weiler & Cesa, 2019; Cohen et al., 2019a; Bekkers, 2020; Venkataraman et al., 2020).”