The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics (2nd ed.)

236 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003 (2008, methodology): “procedure used to keep the numbers of subjects in the different groups of a clinical trial closely balanced at all times [26], is done prior to the exposure being selected, whereas matching is done once the exposure has been selected.”
Statistical Modeling of Spatially Stratified Heterogeneous Data (2022, methodology): “Heterogeneity is a term used in statistics to indicate that one or more statistical characteristics of interest are not the same across all subsets of the population (Everitt and Skrondal 2010, 204).”
Dendrites of dentate gyrus granule cells contribute to pattern separation by controlling sparsity (2016, background): “Error bars represent the standard error of the mean Erevitt and Skrondal (2010).”
Measuring Mindfulness: First Steps Towards the Development of a Comprehensive Mindfulness Scale (2012, methodology): “20) corrected item-total correlation (Everitt 2002) were screened in order to establish if low item-to-scale correlation was due to a poor formulation of the items.”
Effects of expressive writing on depressive symptoms—A meta‐analysis (2018, background): “Another possibility for the absence of changes in depressive symptoms might be due to a floor effect, meaning that assessment tools with lower limits cannot reliably distinguish between participants’ scores close to this limit (Everitt, 2002).”