Electromagnetic Extraction of Energy from Kerr Black Holes

By I. Okamoto. 2005

473 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The energy extraction process from Kerr black holes is elucidated compared with that from pulsars in force-free degenerate electrodynamics (FFDE). It is argued for the force-free magnetosphere of a Kerr black hole in a steady axisymmetric state that the function of unipolar inductors in the presence of global magnetic fluxes threading the horizon is equipped by a frame-dragging effect in the Kerr spacetime metric to the upper null surface, SN, with the axial distance, � N, where the local value of the angular velocity of the frame-dragging, ω, is equal to the rotational frequency of each field line, i.e., ω(� N )= ΩF, and the rotational velocity of each field line, vF, measured by “zeroangular-momentum-observers” changes in sign. There must be a pair-creation gap at SN, from which the paired winds, ingoing and outgoing, are initiated. The poloidal electric current, I, for each wind is determined by solving the eigenvalue problem with the “criticality condition” imposed at the fast surfaces nearly at the horizon and at infinity, and the “current-closure condition” at SN determines the ultimate eigenvalues of ΩF and I in terms of the hole’s angular velocity, ΩH = ω(rH), and the distribution of the magnetic flux at the horizon. It is not in the ordinary ergosphere, but in the effective ergosphere in the region of ΩH >ω> ΩF and vF < 0 that general-relativistic effects play the most significant role for electromagnetic extraction of the hole’s energy. The flow there must be regarded as an ingoing magneto-centrifugal wind, rather than an accretion flow. In a kind of extreme state that “force-free” field lines be frozen in “massless” particles in FFDE, the “membrane paradigm” combined with the DC circuit model is useful in black hole as well as pulsar magnetospheres.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d5c4ce9a7cd16a05cb071ea9faacedb74c193f4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Bing Zhang
  2. Pawan Kumar
  3. Luciano Rezzolla
  4. E. Barausse
  5. R. Maiolino
  6. M. Mościbrodzka
  7. C. Caprini
  8. S. Aalto

Citations in the corpus