Multiple physical elements to determine the gravitational-wave signatures of core-collapse supernovae

By K. Kotake. 2011

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract We review recent progress in the theoretical predictions of gravitational waves (GWs) of core-collapse supernovae. Following a brief summary of the methods in the numerical modeling, we summarize multiple physical elements that determine the GW signatures which have been considered to be important in extracting the information of the long-veiled explosion mechanism from the observation of the GWs. We conclude with a summary of the most urgent tasks to make the dream come true.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d5ac0b052be81c15bde34d3a43fd2aa3a583308

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. D. Vartanyan
2. Hiroki Nagakura
3. David Radice
4. Adam Burrows
5. V. Morozova
6. R. Durrer
7. S. Horiuchi
8. J. Kneller

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

1. D. Vartanyan
2. Hiroki Nagakura
3. David Radice
4. Adam Burrows
5. V. Morozova
6. R. Durrer
7. S. Horiuchi
8. J. Kneller

Citations in the corpus

• Characterizing the Gravitational Wave Signal from Core-collapse Supernovae (2018, background): “…have long been considered promising sources of gravitational waves (GWs) for ground-based detectors (Wheeler 1966; Finn & Evans 1990; Ott 2009; Kotake 2013) such as the AdvancedLaser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO; Aasi et al. 2015), AdvancedVirgo (Acernese et al. 2015),…”
• What can be learned from a future supernova neutrino detection (2017, background): “The gravitational wave signal is highly dependent on the rotation and asphericity of the collapsed core [393, 394], something the neutrinos are more subtly sensitive to [395].”
• General relativity and cosmic structure formation (2015, background): “This conceptually clean approach is very general and can be applied to various settings where the Newtonian approximation fails or becomes inaccurate, ranging from simulations of models with dynamical dark energy [3] or warm/hot dark matter [4] to core collapse supernova explosions [5].”
• The Gravitational Wave Signal from Core-collapse Supernovae (2018, methodology): “Attempts to characterize the GW emission from CCSNe started in 1960s with the analytical estimates of Wheeler (1966) and evolved into the fully relativistic multidimensional numerical simulations of the early 2000s (see reviews of Ott 2009 and Kotake 2013).”