Causally Correct Partial Models for Reinforcement Learning

By Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Ivo Danihelka, George Papamakarios, Nan Rosemary Ke, Ray Jiang, Theophane Weber, Karol Gregor, Hamza Merzic, Fabio Viola, Jane X. Wang and 4 more. 2020

36 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In reinforcement learning, we can learn a model of future observations and rewards, and use it to plan the agent's next actions. However, jointly modeling future observations can be computationally expensive or even intractable if the observations are high-dimensional (e.g. images). For this reason, previous works have considered partial models, which model only part of the observation. In this paper, we show that partial models can be causally incorrect: they are confounded by the observations they don't model, and can therefore lead to incorrect planning. To address this, we introduce a general family of partial models that are provably causally correct, yet remain fast because they do not need to fully model future observations.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Reinforcement Learning

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Yoshua Bengio
  3. Pieter Abbeel
  4. Mohit Bansal
  5. Quoc V. Le
  6. Ruslan Salakhutdinov
  7. Kyunghyun Cho
  8. Jianfeng Gao

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Yoshua Bengio
  2. Danilo Jimenez Rezende
  3. Bernhard Schölkopf
  4. C. Pal
  5. Michael C. Mozer
  6. Nando de Freitas
  7. Sergey Levine
  8. Felix Hill

In Reinforcement Learning

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Pieter Abbeel
  3. Jimmy Ba
  4. Chelsea Finn
  5. Yoshua Bengio
  6. Yuxi Li
  7. Marc G. Bellemare
  8. Nando de Freitas

Citations in the corpus