Explaining in conversation: towards an argument model.

By Charles Antaki, I. Leudar. 1992

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety (2019, background): “03729 Ginet, C. (2008). In defense of a non-causal account of reasons explanations. The Journal of Ethics, 12(3-4), 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-008-9033-z Goebel, R., Chander, A., Holzinger, K., Lecue, F., Akata, Z., Stumpf, S., ... & Holzinger, A. (2018). Explainable AI: the new 42?.”
Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI (2019, background): “This includes contexts such as learning and teaching (Lombrozo, 2016); lay explanations of social behavior (e.g., Antaki, 1989; Axelrod, 2015), argumentation (Antaki and Leudar, 1992), and social attribution (Hilton, 2017; Slugoski, Lalljee, Lamb, and Ginsburg, 1993).”
Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences (2017, methodology): “Walton’s explanation dialogues [179, 181, 182], which build on well-accepted models from argumentation, are closer to the notion of computational models than that of Hilton [72] or Antaki and Leudar [3].”
Explaining Explanations in AI (2018, background): “Conversational explanations are used to both offer causes of an event and back claims as to the truth or relevance of these causes (Antaki and Leudar, 1992).”
Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiences (2021, background): “Antaki and Leudar [9] extended this model to a wider class of argumentative dialogue for the common pattern of claim-backing in explanations.”
How People Explain Behavior: A New Theoretical Framework (1999, unknown): “…uses that refer to mere causes (e.g., " The reason for our ongoing recession is lack of consumer confidence " ), and it does not include uses that cite evidence and thereby back up claims or beliefs ( " There's no reason to believe he's a communist " ) (cf. Anscombe, 1957; Antaki & Leudar, 1992).”