Sudden Cardiac Death Prediction and Prevention Report From a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Heart Rhythm Society Workshop

By G. I. Fishman, Sumeet S. Chugh, J P DiMarco, Christine M. Albert, Mark E. Anderson, R. Bonow, Alfred E. Buxton, Peng-Sheng Chen, M. Estes, X. Jouven and 11 more. Circulation, 2010

637 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Despite the significant decline in coronary artery disease (CAD) mortality in the second half of the 20th century,1 sudden cardiac death (SCD) continues to claim 250 000 to 300 000 US lives annually.2 In North America and Europe the annual incidence of SCD ranges between 50 to 100 per 100 000 in the general population.3,–,6 Because of the absence of emergency medical response systems in most world regions, worldwide estimates are currently not available.7 However, even in the presence of advanced first responder systems for resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the overall survival rate in a recent North American analysis was 4.6%.8 SCD can manifest as ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), pulseless electric activity (PEA), or asystole. In a significant proportion of patients, SCD can present without warning or a recognized triggering mechanism. The mean age of those affected is in the mid 60s, and at least 40% of patients will suffer SCD before the age of 65.4 Consequently, enhancement of methodologies for prediction and prevention of SCD acquires a unique and critical importance for management of this significant public health issue. Prediction and prevention of SCD is an area of active investigation, but considerable challenges persist that limit the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of available methodologies.7,9,10 It was recognized early on that optimization of SCD risk stratification will require integration of multi-disciplinary efforts at the bench and bedside, with studies in the general population.11,–,13 This integration has yet to be effectively accomplished. There is also increasing awareness that more investigation needs to be directed toward identification of early predictors of SCD.14 Significant advancements have occurred for risk prediction in the inherited channelopathies15,–,17 and …

Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d4e7e25a1f3ab96264a555a020e51e766ab69ef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. Natalia A. Trayanova
  2. Hermenegild Arevalo
  3. Fijoy Vadakkumpadan
  4. Katherine C. Wu
  5. Eliseo Guallar
  6. Peter Malamas
  7. A. Jebb

Citations in the corpus