Comparative studies on the feeding behavior of two heterotrophic nanoflagellates: the filter-feeding choanoflagellate Monosiga ovata and the raptorial-feeding kinetoplastid Rhynchomonas nasuta
By J. Boenigk, H. Arndt. 2000
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d4d491e10f9117f1b8cb364a75b363c2cbbba2c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Molecular Biology
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- The Selective Value of Bacterial Shape (2006, background): “Another common mechanism is that used by filter-feeding protozoa, which trap bacteria by straining water through a sieving apparatus (23, 24, 150, 246).”
- Interactions Between Bacteria, Protozoa and Nematodes in Soil (2012, background): “In line with Boenigk and Arndt (2000) we suggest a more narrow definition of interception feeding and restrict its use to describe the feeding process where protozoa, in particular flagellates, create a water current and directly intercept individual food particles in free suspension transported…”
- Growth, feeding and ecological roles of the mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates in marine planktonic food webs (2010, background): “In general, there are 3 major feeding mechanisms of free-living protists (Boenigk and Arndt 2000; Fenchel 1987; Sleigh 1989): raptorial feeding, filter/interception feeding, and diffusion feeding.”