A historical overview of the scientific study of bereavement.

By C. Parkes. 2001

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d4d1cb8df7001ece56415352ab86324c1cb7c27

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Margaret Stroebe
2. Henk Schut
3. Wolfgang Stroebe
4. Millie Cordaro
5. R. Neimeyer
6. Henk Aarts
7. C. Valentine
8. G. V. Koningsbruggen

In Health

1. Margaret Stroebe
2. Henk Schut
3. Millie Cordaro
4. Wolfgang Stroebe
5. R. Neimeyer

Citations in the corpus

• Paving the way: From early attachment theory to contemporary bereavement research (2002, background): “Recently, both Parkes (2001) and Shaver and Tancredy (2001) have elaborated on the links between types of attachment (secure versus the three insecure types) and different types of complication in the grieving process.”
• Attachment in Coping with Bereavement: A Theoretical Integration (2005, background): “More recently, Archer (1999), Parkes (2001), and Shaver and Tancredy (2001) have suggested that individual differences in reactions to loss of a love partner during adulthood are related to attachment representations of the partner in terms of the secure and insecure styles of attachment, as…”
• Pet Loss and Disenfranchised Grief: Implications for Mental Health Counseling Practice (2012, background): “Civen the complexity of grief, its manifestation has been considered in several theories (Parkes, 2001).”