Selective Attention and Anxiety: A Perspective on Developmental Issues and the Causal Status

By Merel Kindt, M. A. van den Hout. 2001

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d490a6650214c07f1368013c6379fd2b5da722f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Marinus H. van IJzendoorn
2. M. Bakermans‐Kranenburg
3. Yair Bar-Haim
4. S. R. Staugaard
5. B. Olatunji
6. J. Belsky
7. R. Fearon

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. M. Bakermans‐Kranenburg
2. Yair Bar-Haim
3. David H. Rakison
4. Marinus H. van IJzendoorn
5. Vanessa Lobue

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. M. Bakermans‐Kranenburg
2. Yair Bar-Haim
3. Dominique Lamy
4. David H. Rakison
5. Marinus H. van IJzendoorn
6. Lee Pergamin
7. Vanessa Lobue
8. S. R. Staugaard

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. (2005, unknown): “particularly prone to bias their attention towards threatening information (for reviews see [6,174,175]).”
• Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. (2007, background): “According to this view, a significant attentional bias is expected in both anxious and nonanxious young children (Kindt & van den Haut, 2001).”
• What we fear most: A developmental advantage for threat-relevant stimuli (2013, background): “A few others have proposed a similar account, suggesting that all individuals have biases for threat early in development, and children that do not learn to inhibit such biases are particularly susceptible to developing later fear and anxiety (Field & Lester, 2010; Kindt & van den Hout, 2001).”