TREC 2006 Legal Track Overview

By Jason R. Baron, David D. Lewis, Douglas W. Oard. 2006

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

1. Jimmy J. Lin
2. Rodrigo Nogueira
3. Andrew Yates
4. Mark Sanderson
5. Donna K. Harman
6. William Webber
7. Douglas W. Oard
8. Maura R. Grossman

Citations in the corpus

• Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyond (2020, background): “The TREC Legal Track, which ran from 2006 [Baron et al., 2006] to 2011 [Grossman et al.”
• Test Collection Based Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems (2010, methodology): “Search supporting e-discovery was examined in the TREC legal track [22], another area of IR where the users (e.”
• Information Retrieval for E-Discovery (2013, methodology): “Automated and Boolean methods were compared in the Ad Hoc Task of the Legal Track of TREC 2006, TREC 2007, and TREC 2008 [15, 103, 153].”
• Overview of the TREC 2011 Legal Track (2011, background): “The 2011 TREC Legal Track was the sixth since the Track’s inception in 2006, and the third that has used a collection based on Enron email (see [5, 14, 12, 11, 6]).”
• Information Retrieval Evaluation (2011, methodology): “20 1.6 Cambridge and the “Ideal” Test Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .”