FIFTY YEARS OF REGIONAL INEQUALITY IN CHINA: A JOURNEY THROUGH REVOLUTION, REFORM AND OPENNESS

By Ravi Kanbur, Xiaobo Zhang. 2001

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d3705909f2aab326d5f60260f09f0f4dfd63f05

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Chunli Shen
2. Jing Jin
3. HENG-FU ZOU
4. Gewei Wang
5. J. Lin
6. Yaohui Zhao
7. T. Baskaran
8. Jon H. Fiva

Citations in the corpus

• The relative contributions of location and preferential policies in China's regional development: being in the right place and having the right incentives $ (2002, unknown): “(2000), De´murger (2001), Kanbur and Zhang (2001) , and Zhang, Liu, and Yao (2001).”
• Regional Inequality and Decentralization: An Empirical Analysis (2012, unknown): “Single-country studies are provided by Kim et al (2003) for Korea; Kanbur and Zhang (2005) and Qiao et al (2008) for China; Silva (2005) for the Philippines; Bonet (2006) for Colombia; Akai and Hosio (2009) for the United States; and Calamai (2009) for Italy.”
• Regional Inequality and Labor Transfers in China* (2004, background): “Wei and Wu (2002) focus on the effect of globalization, especially foreign direct investment; Kanbur and Zhang (2001) examine openness and fiscal decentralization.”
• Access to Markets and Rural Poverty: Evidence from Household Consumption in China (2013, unknown): “In an analysis of the time series data for 1952 to 1999, Kanbur and Zhang (2005) find that regional inequality in China can be explained by three key variables: the degree of openness (proxied by the average tariff rate), the degree of centralization, and the ratio of heavy industry to gross output…”
• Fiscal Decentralization in China: History, Impact, Challenges and Next Steps (2012, background): “Kanbur and Zhang (2001) examined the time series of regional inequality measured by the GE coefficient over the period of 1952—1999.”
• Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Disparity: Evidence from Cross-Section and Panel Data (2009, unknown): “Single-country studies include those of Kim et al (2003) for the case of Korea, Akai and Sakata (2004) for the USA, Kanbur and Zhang (2005) for China, and Bonet (2006) for Colombia.”
• Labor Market Distortions, Rural-Urban Inequality and the Opening of China’s Economy (2003, unknown): “Over the last fifty years, there have been three peaks in regional inequality within China: the Great Famine of the 1950’s, the Cultural Revolution of the late 60’s and early 70’s, and, most recently the period of openness and global integration of the 1990’s (Kanbur and Zhang, 2001).”
• Estimating Income Inequality in China Using Grouped Data and the Generalized Beta Distribution (2007, unknown): “For example, Kanbur and Zhang (2005) show a Gini coefficient of 0.”