Evaluations of Sexy Women In Low- and High-Status Jobs

By Peter Glick, Sadie E. Larsen, C. Johnson, Heather Branstiter. 2005

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies, Museology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d31a37e9e50424f35ccfe945dfedc9250a619d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Carly J. Chrouser
2. R. Gurung

In Gender Studies

1. Carly J. Chrouser
2. R. Gurung

In Museology

1. Carly J. Chrouser
2. R. Gurung

Citations in the corpus

• But You Don’t Look Like A Scientist!: Women Scientists with Feminine Appearance are Deemed Less Likely to be Scientists (2016, unknown): “…hand-drawn) stimuli, and/or a very minimal number of stimuli (e.g., using the same female Bjob applicant^ dressed in a sexy vs. non-sexy manner; see Glick et al. 2005; using the same female role model and having her dress in feminine or non-feminine clothing; Betz and Sekaquaptewa 2012).”
• Predicting Objectification: Do Provocative Clothing and Observer Characteristics Matter? (2007, methodology): “Instead a woman can easily emphasize (or deemphasize) her sex appeal through clothing ( Glick et al. 2005 ).”