A critical reflection on the future of financial, intellectual capital, sustainability and integrated reporting
By C. de Villiers, Umesh Sharma. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2017
266 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract This paper examines the future of IC reporting by offering critical reflection on different forms of reporting, with a particular focus on Integrated Reporting ( ). While, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework for corporate social responsibility disclosures, the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), and the various financial reporting regulators appear to be in a contest for supremacy, what does this mean for IC? We examine how IC is reported under each of these frameworks and conclude that is unlikely to subsume traditional financial statement reporting, nor will it be able to provide all the information currently reported in GRI-type reports. The interplay of these reporting frameworks and their future development bodes well for IC, because different kinds of IC information will be reported under each of , GRI-type reports and in financial statements; that is IC does not compete with these forms of reporting forms, but forms an essential part of each.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d213d17033c6c3dc6a373af038ff487672c8e25
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- The readability of integrated reports (2017, background): “…the financial statements is required for stakeholders to accurately gauge how companies are creating or destroying value (Buitendag et al., 2017; De Villiers & Sharma, 2017; De Villiers & van Staden, 2010b; Flower, 2015; Krzus, 2011b; Phillips et al., 2011; Rahman, 2014; Setia et al., 2015; Wee et…”