Adjudication without Enforcement in GATT Disputes

By E. Reinhardt. 2001

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d20d67e95066887957893f6cb577aef133757e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. E. Reinhardt
2. M. Busch
3. C. Bown
4. Beth A. Simmons
5. C. L. Davis
6. Meredith A. Crowley
7. S. Bermeo
8. Paul Ingram

In Political Science and International Relations

1. E. Reinhardt
2. M. Busch
3. C. Bown
4. Beth A. Simmons
5. C. L. Davis
6. S. Bermeo

In Strategy and Management

1. E. Reinhardt
2. M. Busch
3. C. Bown
4. C. L. Davis
5. Beth A. Simmons
6. S. Bermeo
7. Paul Ingram

Citations in the corpus

• Developing Countries and General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement (2003, methodology): “This pro-plaintiff leaning also accords with previous studies of GATT (Reinhardt, 2001).”
• Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement : Complainants, Interested Parties, and Free Riders (2005, background): “9See, for example, Busch (2000) and Busch and Reinhardt (2000) and Reinhardt (2001).”
• International Institutions and the Volatility of International Trade (2008, unknown): “…Bown 2003; and Busch, Raciborski, and Reinhardt 2007+ Francois and Niels ~2004! demonstrate the same finding as applied to Mexico’s AD investigations+ 29+ See Reinhardt 2001; and Busch and Reinhardt 2003+ 30+ Desai and Hines 2004+ 31+ Australian, 26 June 2001, 15+ 32+ Mansfield and Reinhardt…”