CLONAL INTEGRATION AND THE EXPANSION OF PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS

By Lindsay K. Amsberry, Michael A. Baker, P. Ewanchuk, M. Bertness. 2000

247 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Earth-Surface Processes, Ecology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d0a02797267188b9bfa355e36792ea799288344

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Earth-Surface Processes

1. J. Zedler
2. S. Findlay
3. S. Kercher
4. F. Nordlie
5. A. Whitfield

In Ecology

1. J. Zedler
2. S. A. Brown
3. Petr Pyšek
4. Stacy M. Hagan
5. K. Able
6. J. Levine
7. L. Meyerson
8. P. Adler

In Oceanography

1. Stacy M. Hagan
2. H. Brix
3. Dorte L. Hansen
4. S. Findlay
5. J. Zedler
6. Petr Pyšek
7. C. Lambertini
8. L. Meyerson

Citations in the corpus

• Clone-specific differences in Phragmites australis : Effects of ploidy level and geographic origin (2007, background): “This invasion can be attributable to the effective vegetative spread of P. australis, colonizing habitats it is unable to invade directly with seeds or rhizomes (Amsberry et al., 2000).”
• Can nutrients alone shift a sedge meadow towards dominance by the invasive Typha × glauca (2002, background): “Large rhizomes not only store nutrients but also allow resource sharing among ramets (de Kroon and van Groenendael 1997, Hutchings and Wijesinghe 1997, Amsberry et al. 2000).”
• Mechanisms of marsh habitat alteration due toPhragmites: Response of young-of-the-year mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) to treatment forPhragmites removal (2003, background): “Trin ex Steud., in marsh systems along the East Coast of the United States is well-documented (Havens et al. 1997; Chambers et al. 1999; Amsberry et al. 2000; Meyerson et al. 2000; Weinstein et al. 2000).”
• Seed Banks of Phragmites australis -Dominated Brackish Wetlands: Relationships to Seed Viability, Inundation, and Land Cover (2010, unknown): “The expansion of patches from sites that are higher in the intertidal zone into areas that are lower will likely only occur through clonal expansion, as also reported elsewhere (Chambers et al., 1999; Amsberry et al., 2000; Bart and Hartman, 2000; Engloner et al., 2010).”
• Microbial growth and nitrogen retention in litter of Phragmites australis compared to Typha angustifolia (2002, background): “The exact mechanism allowing this increase in standing stock is uncertain, although transport of nutrients among different parts of a plant stand (clonal integration) has been shown to allow P. australis expansion into harsh environments (Amsberry et al. 2000).”
• A meta‐analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions (2004, background): “Amsberry et al. (2000) also showed biotic resistance excluding an invader at the edge of its physiological capacities.”
• Biological Flora of the British Isles: Phragmites australis (2017, background): “Clonal integration and spread from the upland fringe, and deep rhizomes that access freshwater, enabled growth under highly saline conditions in this marsh (Amsberry et al. 2000; Meyerson, Vogt & Chambers 2000).”
• Effects of clonal integration and light availability on the growth and physiology of two invasive herbs (2010, background): “The advantageous effect of clonal integration on the growth of ramets varies among species (Amsberry et al. 2000; Pennings & Callaway 2000).”
• Rhizome growth dynamics of native and exotic haplotypes ofPhragmites australis (Common reed) (2006, background): “Phragmites has been described as an ecosystem engineer (Amsberry et al. 2000) or habitat-modifying organism (Rooth et al. 2003), and its effects on sediment dynamics and water cycling have affected the community and ecosystem.”