Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures

By N. Richards. 2001

313 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d0498bceae60dabaa6b90b318a2c9b78c79e637

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. I. Sichel
2. J. Merchant
3. Alana Johns
4. Sandra Chung
5. J. Griffiths
6. Ž. Bošković
7. William Harwood
8. A. Lipták

Citations in the corpus

• Fragments and ellipsis (2005, background): “…Japanese lacks overt A'-movement with specCP as a final landing site must derive from some other property of the grammar, as usually assumed (see Richards 2001 for one system that could capture this: let the wh features on C and D in Japanese be weak, and the one on Foc be strong, for example;…”
• Resumptive Pronouns and Competition (2014, background): “This is likely to be due to the relative height of the two PPs within VP and to constraints on the interaction of the two chains (Pesetsky 1982, Richards 2001, Fox and Pesetsky 2004).”
• Restricting noun incorporation: root movement (2007, methodology): “In a previous version of this paper, I proposed using Tucking In ( Richards 2001 ) to move the intermediate elements.”