On the Construction of Imputation Classes in Surveys
By David Haziza, Jean-Francois Beaumont. 2007
84 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d03d3f55135f497f9ebbe49243ab667395262b9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Rebecca Andridge
- Roderick J. A. Little
- Sixia Chen
- David Haziza
- Paul T. von Hippel
- Victoria Savalei
- Zhiqiang Tan
- Craig K. Enders
Citations in the corpus
- Quantifying fishing effort: a synthesis of current methods and their applications (2008, unknown): “Biases from questionnaires associated with non-respondents, which would arise if respondents are significantly different than non-respondents, can be minimized by using response propensity stratification to adjust survey results to remove non-response bias (Fisher 1996; Haziza and Beaumont 2007).”
- Multiply robust imputation procedures for the treatment of item nonresponse in surveys (2017, background): “A missing value within a class was replaced by the value of a respondent selected with replacement within the same class with equal selection probabilities (Little, 1986; Haziza & Beaumont, 2007).”
- A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non‐response (2010, methodology): “Stratification via predictive means and response propensities are compared in the context of the hot deck in Haziza & Beaumont (2007).”