SME Policy, Financial Structure and Firm Growth: Evidence From Japan

By Yuji Honjo, Nobuyuki Harada. 2006

189 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9cffb754e573043b724b54cebbeef0064dd338c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Entrepreneurship and the determinants of firm survival within regions: human capital, growth motivation and locational conditions (2017, unknown): “Where policy can perhaps have most influence is in shaping the strategic choices of local small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) through targeted support (Smallbone, Leigh, and North 1995; Honjo and Harada 2006).”
Formal business networking and SME growth (2013, methodology): “Honjo and Harada (2006) claim that this kind of research is scarce.”
The impact of government financial support on the performance of new firms: the role of competitive advantage as an intermediate outcome (2014, background): “Government financial support through loans and equity can allow new ventures not only to accumulate assets (Honjo and Harada 2006) and to obtain access to critical resources (e.g. technology, licenses and equipment), but also to invest in internal firm processes such as employee training (a…”
Family Business Succession and Its Impact on Financial Structure and Performance (2010, background): “Company age is not included in the regressions because of the collinearity problem that can occur between this variable and the year dummies in a withinfirm analysis (Honjo & Harada, 2006).”
NO DEEP POCKETS: SOME STYLIZED EMPIRICAL RESULTS ON FIRMS' FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS (2010, unknown): “constraints are more severe, while Honjo and Harada (2006), using cash flow, leverage and the approval in a public incentives programme to identify constraints, for a sample of Japanese manufacturing firms during the period 1995–1999, find”