Integrating behaviour into wildlife conservation: the multiple ways that behaviour can reduce Ne

By Laura L. Anthony, Daniel T. Blumstein. 2000

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9cfb59fc9c69e091c13603a680b57fa1e392671d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Small Animals

Citations in the corpus

The mating system of the brown bear Ursus arctos (2012, background): “In addition, indirect demographic effects may occur (Anthony & Blumstein 2000), that is, those that affect population growth rates, because of an altered population structure (Bischof et al. 2009), as well as evolutionary and habitat effects (Allendorf & Hard 2009).”
Wildlife conservation and animal temperament: causes and consequences of evolutionary change for captive, reintroduced, and wild populations (2006, background): “…9 (2006) 39–48 c 2005 The Zoological Society of London 43 direct human contact or of human encroachment, and humans can cause changes in wild animal behaviour (Mattson, Blanchard & Knight, 1992; Lord, Waas & Innes, 1997; Anthony & Blumstein, 2000; Louis & Le Beere, 2000; Lacy & Martins, 2003).”
Should we consider individual behavior differences in applied wildlife conservation studies (2017, background): “…and reviews that highlight the implications of animal personality in applied wildlife conservation and management practice (Angeloni et al., 2008; Anthony and Blumstein, 2000; Blumstein and Fernández-Juricic, 2010; Caro, 2007; Festa-Bianchet and Apollonio, 2003; Greggor et al., 2016; Smith and…”
The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation (2010, background): “On the other hand, it could become a promising branch of the Conservation Behaviour discipline, which often lacks precise information on the behaviours we should be concerned about (Anthony and Blumstein 2000).”
How Many Animals Do We Want to Save? The Many Ways of Setting Population Target Levels for Conservation (2006, background): “…these behaviors may be preserved by seeking demographic sustainability or ecological functionality, ethological studies showing how behavior and social dynamics change with population size may identify other population thresholds necessary for certain desired behaviors (Anthony and Blumstein 2000).”
Evaluating methods to quantify anthropogenic stressors on wild animals (2007, background): “Modification of the mechanisms animals use to select their mates may have implications for species survival through its effects on an individual’s reproductive success, and thus its effects on population growth rate and the effective population size (Anthony and Blumstein, 2000).”
A review of factors to consider when using camera traps to study animal behavior to inform wildlife ecology and conservation (2020, unknown): “Behavioral change can serve as an early warning sign for demographic impacts (Wiley & Ridley, 2016), shed light on species adaptations to changing environments (Rabaiotti & Woodroffe, 2019), and highlight potential conservation interventions (Anthony & Blumstein, 2000).”
Mobility decisions and the predation risks of reintroduction (2002, background): “Whereas our data fit the prediction of Banks et al. (2000) for the mortality risks of naı̈ve voles due to the attractiveness of their accumulated wastes, it is possible that mortality rates declined over time not due to increased mobility but due to increased local experience.”