Characterization of an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS): Intercomparison with Other Aerosol Instruments

By N. Takegawa, Yuzo Miyazaki, Yutaka Kondo, Y. Komazaki, T. Miyakawa, J. L. Jimenez, J. Jayne, D. Worsnop, James Allan, R. J. Weber. 2005

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9cf5f13c6789a910d1df2aec771b746bdfbf0d56

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. D. Worsnop
2. T. Onasch
3. M. Canagaratna
4. J. Jayne
5. T. Deshler
6. J. Jimenez
7. P. DeCarlo
8. P. Ziemann

In Global and Planetary Change

1. T. Deshler
2. J. Jimenez
3. P. DeCarlo
4. D. Worsnop

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. D. Worsnop
2. T. Onasch
3. J. Jimenez
4. P. DeCarlo
5. P. Ziemann

Citations in the corpus

• Transmission Efficiency of an Aerodynamic Focusing Lens System: Comparison of Model Calculations and Laboratory Measurements for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (2007, methodology): “For many atmospheric measurements of ambient particulate matter, using a size-independent CE works well (Canagaratna et al. 2007; Drewnick et al. 2003; Takegawa et al. 2005).”
• O/C and OM/OC ratios of primary, secondary, and ambient organic aerosols with high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry. (2008, result): “A factor of 1.4 is traditionally used, although recent results support larger values (6, 9 , 10), which are largely a function of the oxygen content.”