An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy
By M. S. Andersen. 2007
787 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ce488f1e525e8395addc81e0f1eb33925198c63
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- C. Michael Hall
- S. Gössling
- M. Hasanagic
- Yong Geng
- Henri Kuokkanen
- Leena Aarikka‐Stenroos
- D. D’Amato
- Jouni Korhonen
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- C. Michael Hall
- S. Gössling
- M. Hasanagic
- Yong Geng
- Henri Kuokkanen
- D. D’Amato
- Jouni Korhonen
- Kannan Govindan
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- C. Michael Hall
- S. Gössling
- M. Hasanagic
- Yong Geng
- Henri Kuokkanen
- D. D’Amato
- Jouni Korhonen
- Kannan Govindan
Citations in the corpus
- Circular Economy Contributions to the Tourism Sector: A Critical Literature Review (2020, background): “Circular Economy as a new economic model has its origins in Environmental Economics, whose aim is the integration of science into sustainability and sustainable development [32].”
- Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework (2021, background): “Furthermore, while perpetual loops may be desirable, there are technical, economic and ultimately physical limitations (Andersen, 2007).”
- Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: A cross-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe (2017, background): “, the EC Working Package, China’s CE Promotion Law), and companies (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2016) as an alternative to the prevailing model of economic development: the so-called “linear economy” (Andersen, 2007), otherwise known as the “take, make and dispose” model (Ness, 2008).”
- Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework (2017, background): “not be promoted (Andersen, 2007). The views of Huamao and Fengqi (2007) are also anthropocentric, considering as the ultimate goal the realisation of human beings’ sustainable development.”
- Sharing versus collaborative economy: how to align ICT developments and the SDGs in tourism? (2019, background): “In many ways, the contemporary economy has remained neoliberal in its organization (Jackson & Senker, 2011; Kotz 2015), even where efforts have been made to redesign and re-label economic systems as a “green economy” (Barbier, 2012) or a “circular economy” (Andersen, 2007), as part of the attempt to”
- Comparing linear and circular supply chains: a case study from the construction industry (2017, background): “This consequently reduces the need for virgin materials for economic activity (Andersen, 2006; Genovese et al., 2015).”
- Progress Toward a Circular Economy in China (2011, background): “We agree with Andersen (2007) that the idea of the circular economy is still largely confined to consideration of physical flows, and the economic drivers (and inhibitors) of eco-industrial initiatives have yet to receive sufficient attention.”
- Unlocking circular business: A framework of barriers and drivers (2019, background): “From the economic perspective, CE is seen to provide opportunities for cost savings, e.g. by reducing waste and energy costs (Andersen, 2007; Esposito et al., 2015; Ghisellini et al., 2016; Liu and Bai, 2014; Murray et al., 2015; Pitt and Heinemeyer, 2015; Rizos et al., 2015).”
- Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: why the circular economy cannot work (2018, background): “…symbiosis (Babbage 1835 p 217; Ayres and Simonis 1994; Chertow 2007), biomimicry (Merrill 1982; Benyus 2002), Cradle-to-Cradle (McDonough and Braungart 2002), eco-efficiency (Schaltegger and Sturm 1989; Schmidheiny 1992) and waste-is-food (Babbage 1835 p 217; Andersen 2007; Sherwin 2013).”