Cross wavelet analysis: significance testing and pitfalls

By Douglas Maraun, J. Kurths. 2004

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract. In this paper, we present a detailed evaluation of cross wavelet analysis of bivariate time series. We develop a statistical test for zero wavelet coherency based on Monte Carlo simulations. If at least one of the two processes considered is Gaussian white noise, an approximative formula for the critical value can be utilized. In a second part, typical pitfalls of wavelet cross spectra and wavelet coherency are discussed. The wavelet cross spectrum appears to be not suitable for significance testing the interrelation between two processes. Instead, one should rather apply wavelet coherency. Furthermore we investigate problems due to multiple testing. Based on these results, we show that coherency between ENSO and NAO is an artefact for most of the time from 1900 to 1995. However, during a distinct period from around 1920 to 1940, significant coherency between the two phenomena occurs.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ce3b6ab2ecfb99b46272ed989f9f381e9ee3b92

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. E. K. Ng
  2. J. Chan

Citations in the corpus