On the competition between particle fracture and particle decohesion in metal matrix composites

By L. Babout, Y. Bréchet, Eric Maire, R. Fougères. 2004

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9cd86c41f209a54242aeba40acf8e7ba6b563706

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

1. Jean-Baptiste Leblond
2. A. Needleman
3. A. A. Benzerga
4. Viggo Tvergaard
5. D. Mohr
6. A. Pineau
7. J. Willis
8. K. Madou

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Jean-Baptiste Leblond
2. A. Needleman
3. A. A. Benzerga
4. Viggo Tvergaard
5. D. Mohr
6. A. Pineau
7. L. Xue
8. Pedro Ponte Castañeda

Citations in the corpus

• Ductile Fracture by Void Growth to Coalescence (2010, methodology): “Some of these assume perfect bonding between matrix and particle and aim at examining local stress and plastic strain distributions that could not be obtained analytically (Thomson and Hancock, 1984; Babout et al., 2004b).”
• Ductile failure modeling (2016, background): “, Babout et al. 2004; Kondori and Benzerga 2014). Criteria (31) and (33) both predict that the effective yield stress in pure Fig. 10 Yield loci corresponding to the coalescence model of Torki et al. (2015) (lines) and the finite element results of Tekoglu et al.”