Multispacecraft modeling of the flux rope structure of interplanetary coronal mass ejections: Cylindrically symmetric versus nonsymmetric topologies

By T. Mulligan, C. Russell. 2001

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Constraints on the global structure of magnetic clouds: Transverse size and curvature (2006, methodology): “D R A F T March 19, 2018, 6:52pm D R A F T”
Properties and geoeffectiveness of magnetic clouds in the rising, maximum and early declining phases of solar cycle 23 (2005, methodology): “…the results the kinematic effects, such as the expansion and the assumptions of non-symmetric and non-force free topologies are used in some models, e.g.Farrugia et al. (1993); Marubashi (1997); Osherovich and Burlaga(1997); Mulligan and Russell(2001); Hidalgo et al.(2002a); Hidalgo et al.(2002b).”
On the Magnetic Flux Budget in Low-Corona Magnetic Reconnection and Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections (2007, methodology): “We are aware of certain variations on this approach, such as those with nonYforce-free magnetic field profiles and/or noncircular cross sections (e.g., Mulligan & Russell 2001; Hidalgo et al. 2002).”