Response of a reinforced concrete infilled-frame structure to removal of two adjacent columns

By M. Sasani. 2008

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Mathematical micromodeling of infilled frames: State of the art (2013, background): “From the available published experimental [134,31,189,70,87, 92–94,138,139,17,158,103,140,95,100,175,132,71] and numerical [135,128,80,86,11,16,186,67,164,64,69,60,161] [110,17,18,42,37, 68,172,76,144,176,24,96]data, it canbeobserved thatmasonry infill walls (referred to also as infill walls in this”
Progressive Collapse Resistance of an Actual 11-Story Structure Subjected to Severe Initial Damage (2011, methodology): “This is consistent with analytical and experimental observations from previous studies in which the columns above the removed column rapidly lose their axial compressive force owing to higher speed of axial wave propagation (Sasani et al. 2007; Sasani 2008).”
Dynamic performance of RC beam-column substructures under the scenario of the loss of a corner column—Experimental results (2012, background): “The experimental results of Sasani [13] and Yi et al.”