Comparison Between an Acceptance-Based and a Cognitive-Control-Based Protocol for Coping With Pain

By Olga Gutiérrez, Carmen Luciano, M. Rodríguez, Brandi C. Fink. 2004

249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) empirical evidence: Correlational, experimental psychopathology, component and outcome studies. (2010, methodology): “However, Levin & Hayes (2009) have re-analyzed the database reported by Powers et al.”
Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. (2006, methodology): “Another pain tolerance study (Gutierrez, Luciano, & Fink, 2004) examined the impact of a 20-min long ACT acceptance, defusion and values intervention using the Card Exercise (Hayes, Strosahl et al., 1999, p. 162) and Swamp Metaphor (Hayes, Strosahl et al., 1999, pp. 247–248) as compared to a…”
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy versus Traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Current Empirical Evidence (2012, background): “(2007) Combined Zettle & Hayes (1986) Combined Rost et al. (in press) Post-treatment Hernández López et al. 2009 Combined Bond & Bunce (2000) Combined Twohig et al.”
Relational frame theory, acceptance and commitment therapy, and a functional analytic definition of mindfulness (2005, unknown): “Another pain tolerance study ( Gutierrez, Luciano, & Fink, 2004 ) used a 20-minute ACT protocol focused on acceptance, defusion and values as compared to a cognitive and emotional change intervention.”