Society, community, and economic development

By M. Storper. 2005

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9cb7c239171f8b45db67ba8f9256c2fccc8d0ded

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. A. Rodríguez‐Pose
2. H. Bathelt
3. M. Storper
4. C. Berndt
5. M. Boeckler
6. Max Nathan

In Economics and Econometrics

1. A. Rodríguez‐Pose
2. M. Storper
3. H. Bathelt
4. C. Berndt
5. M. Boeckler
6. R. Crescenzi
7. P. Sunley
8. Henry S. C. Yeung

Citations in the corpus

• Geographies of circulation and exchange: constructions of markets (2009, background): “Laying stress on both local and translocal relations and advancing a geographically more sophisticated understanding of embeddedness, GPN gets a good empirical grip at the multiscalar nature of the processes at work.”
• Better Rules or Stronger Communities? On the Social Foundations of Institutional Change and Its Economic Effects (2006, background): “Both encourage 5 The remainder of this section is a synthesis of a more detailed argument that may be found in Storper (2005).”
• Geographies of production: growth regimes in spatial perspective 3 - toward a relational view of economic action and policy (2006, background): “Storper (2004), for instance, argues that the relation between community and society institutions is decisive in understanding why some places grow faster than others.”
• Why do regions develop and change?: the challenge for geography and economics (2011, background): “Others have tried to theorize such institutions, their micro-economic properties, pathways of change and relationship to regional development and resilience (Storper, 2005, 2008; Rodriguez-Pose and Storper, 2005).”
• The Rise of the “City-region” Concept and its Development Policy Implications (2008, background): “This applies to neo-Schumpeterian (Smulders & van de Klundert, 1995 ; Dosi, 1988 ) and non-neo-Schumpeterian approaches to innovation (Audretsch & Feldman, 1996 ; Sonn & Storper, 2008 ), to creative-class narratives (Florida, 2002 ), or to institutional approaches (Storper, 1997 , 2005 ).”