Identifying the Effects of Firing Restrictions Through Size-Contingent Differences in Regulation

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Employment Protection Legislation, Adjustment Costs and Cross-Country Differences in Cost Behavior (2012, background): “…Botero et al. (2004), Boeri and Jimeno (2005), Haltiwanger et al. (2006), Micco and Pages (2006), Autor et al. (2007), Kugler and Pica (2008), Schivardi and Torrini (2008) document large significant effects of EPL strictness on the long-run aggregate employment levels and other labor market…”
Testing for Manipulation in the Regression Discontinuity Design When the Running Variable Is Discrete (2016, methodology): “…to quantify distortions in firm behavior in response to policies based on firm-size thresholds, such as the Family and Medical Leave Act and the Affordable Care Act in the United States or employment protection laws in Europe (Waldfogel, 1999; Garibaldi et al., 2004; Schivardi and Torrini, 2008).”
Who Pays for It? The Heterogeneous Wage Effects of Employment Protection Legislation (2013, unknown): “The non-existence of lumps at 15 can be explained by the fact that rms choose their size on the basis of several factors and not only on the basis of EPL (Schivardi and Torrini, 2008).”