A Comparison of the Galaxy Populations in the Coma and Distant Clusters: The Evolution of k+a Galaxies and the Role of the Intracluster Medium

By B. Poggianti, T. Bridges, Y. Komiyama, M. Yagi, D. Carter, B. Mobasher, S. Okamura, N. Kashikawa. 2003

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The spectroscopic properties of galaxies in the Coma Cluster are compared with those of galaxies in rich clusters at z ~ 0.5, to investigate the evolution of the star formation history in clusters. Luminous galaxies with MV ≤ -20 and poststarburst/post-star-forming (k+a) spectra that constitute a significant fraction of galaxies in distant cluster samples are absent in Coma, where spectacular cases of k+a spectra are found instead at MV > -18.5 and represent a significant proportion of the cluster dwarf galaxy population. A simple inspection of their positions on the sky indicates that this type of galaxy does not show a preferential location within the cluster, but the bluest and strongest lined group of k+a galaxies lie in projection toward the central 1.4 Mpc of Coma and have radial velocities significantly higher than the cluster mean. We find a striking correlation between the positions of these young and strong poststarburst galaxies and substructure in the hot intracluster medium (ICM) identified from XMM-Newton data, with these galaxies lying close to the edges of two infalling substructures. This result strongly suggests that the interaction with the dense ICM could be responsible for the quenching of the star formation (thus creating the k+a spectrum) and, possibly, for any previous starburst. The evolution with redshift of the luminosity distribution of k+a galaxies can be explained by a "downsizing effect," with the maximum luminosity/mass of actively star-forming galaxies infalling onto clusters decreasing at lower redshift. We discuss the possible physical origin of this downsizing effect and the implications of our results for current scenarios of environmental effects on the star formation in galaxies.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c8ddf559c501b609e801d8f37fc2b939f1bd523

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. C. Conroy
  4. R. Somerville
  5. Christopher J. Conselice
  6. Volker Springel
  7. Simon D. M. White
  8. R. Dav'e

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. C. Conroy
  4. Simon D. M. White
  5. Christopher J. Conselice
  6. R. Somerville
  7. R. Dav'e
  8. Thomas J. Cox

Citations in the corpus