GPS water vapour tomography: preliminary results from the ESCOMPTE field experiment

By Cédric Champollion, Frédéric Masson, M. Bouin, Andrea Walpersdorf, Eric Doerflinger, Olivier Bock, J. van Baelen. 2005

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Water vapour plays a major role in atmospheric processes but remains difficult to quantify due to its high variability in time and space and the sparse set of available measurements. The GPS has proved its capacity to measure the integrated water vapour at zenith with the same accuracy as other methods. Recent studies show that it is possible to quantify the integrated water vapour in the line of sight of the GPS satellite. These observations can be used to study the 3D heterogeneity of the troposphere using tomographic techniques. We develop three-dimensional tomographic software to model the three-dimensional distribution of the tropospheric water vapour from GPS data. First, the tomographic software is validated by simulations based on the realistic ESCOMPTE GPS network configuration. Without a priori information, the absolute value of water vapour is less resolved as opposed to relative horizontal variations. During the ESCOMPTE field experiment, a dense network of 17 dual frequency GPS receivers was operated for 2 weeks within a 20� 20-km area around Marseille (southern France). The network extends from sea level to the top of the Etoile chain (~700 m high). Optimal results have been obtained with time windows of 30-min intervals and input data evaluation every 15 min. The optimal grid for the ESCOMTE geometrical configuration has a horizontal step size of 0.058� 0.058 and 500 m vertical step size. Second, we have compared the results of real data inversions with independent observations. Three inversions have been compared

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c861fc4c48aef5063cd3f82d04d693cd0ac8a93

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

  1. David D. Turner
  2. Witold Rohm

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. J. van Baelen
  2. P. Di Girolamo
  3. R. Michael Hardesty
  4. David D. Turner
  5. Florian Zus
  6. Maria P. Cadeddu
  7. Andreas Behrendt
  8. Volker Wulfmeyer

In Oceanography

  1. J. van Baelen
  2. David D. Turner
  3. Witold Rohm

Citations in the corpus