Steenrod operations and degree formulas
By Alexander S. Merkurjev. 2003
50 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Theoretical Computer Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c839a89ee34152687be28745dd9f5facc5fe95d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geometry and Topology
- N. Karpenko
- A. Vishik
- M. Levine
- Alexander S. Merkurjev
- Markus Spitzweck
- Vladimir Voevodsky
- O. Rondigs
- Thomas H. Geisser
In Mathematical Physics
- N. Karpenko
- A. Vishik
- M. Levine
- Alexander S. Merkurjev
- Markus Spitzweck
- O. Rondigs
- P. Ostvaer
- Thomas H. Geisser
In Theoretical Computer Science
Citations in the corpus
- Upper motives of algebraic groups and incompressibility of Severi–Brauer varieties (2009, methodology): “A recent proof, given in [18], makes use of Steenrod operations on the modulo p Chow groups (it better explains the reason of the p-incompressibility but works only over fields of characteristic 6= p).”
- On the Chow groups of quadratic Grassmannians (2005, background): “We recall from [10] that a variety X is p-compressible if there is a rational map X 99K Y to some variety Y such that dim(Y ) < dim(X) and vp(nX) 6 vp(nY ), where nZ is the image of the degree map deg : CH0(Z) → Z.”
- Algebraic Cobordism (2003, background): “Given a smooth projective irreducible k-scheme X of dimension d > 0, Rost introduces (see [21]) the ideal M(X) ⊂ L∗ = Ω∗(Spec k) generated by classes [Y ] ∈ L∗ of smooth projective k-schemes Y of dimension < d for which there exists a morphism Y → X over k.”