Apportionment of racial diversity: A review

By R. Brown, G. Armelagos. 2001

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Nature of Race (2015, background): “Thus Kant had his half and admixed races, Buffon his Tartars with their Muscovite admixture, Huxley (1870) his Melanochroi who were part Australoid, Hooton his secondary races, and so on.”
Are Ethnic Groups Biological “Species” to the Human Brain? (2001, background): “The supposedly “racial” categories themselves all blend insensibly into each other [Boyd and Silk 2000, Brown and Armelagos 2001]. sistent with the structure of social learning through prestige processes as defended in Henrich and Gil-White (2001).”
Epigenetics and the embodiment of race: Developmental origins of US racial disparities in cardiovascular health (2009, background): “Not only are traditional racial categories poor predictors of gene frequencies, a fact that has been appreciated for decades (Brown and Armelagos, 2001; Lewontin, 1972), but developmental and epigenetic processes help to clarify why genes do not determine biological fates in any simple fashion.”
Race: a social destruction of a biological concept (2010, background): “(Brown and Armelagos 2001, 34) It is interesting that none of these sources cites any empirical evidence for these race-undermining claims.”