Comparing California Current cetacean-habitat models developed using in situ and remotely sensed sea surface temperature data

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Temporal resolutions in species distribution models of highly mobile marine animals: Recommendations for ecologists and managers (2017, background): “Mesoscale ecological questions include elucidating movements and distributions of marine animals in relation to eddies, fronts and current meanders (Becker et al., 2010; Benson et al., 2011; Hobday & Hartog, 2014; Tew Kai & Marsac, 2010).”
Habitat-based spatial models of cetacean density in the eastern Pacific Ocean (2012, methodology): “Only survey effort conducted in sea states corresponding to Beaufort 5 or less was used to build the models, corresponding to the conditions under which f(0) and g(0) estimates were derived (see Barlow et al. 2009, Becker et al. 2010 for further details).”
Scale of inference: on the sensitivity of habitat models for wide‐ranging marine predators to the resolution of environmental data (2017, result): “This result concords with previous analyses of the effects of spatial resolution in other modelling applications (Guisan et al. 2007; Redfern et al. 2008; Becker et al. 2010), but see (Storch 2002; Gottschalk et al.”
Predicting cetacean abundance and distribution in a changing climate (2018, methodology): “Continuous portions of survey effort were divided into approximate 5-km segments to create samples for modelling using the approach described by Becker et al. (2010).”